You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
L-plastin associated syndrome of immune deficiency and haematological cytopenia (PASIC)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, May 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jaci.2024.05.001 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Raquel A Hernandez, James I Hearn, Vijay Bhoopalan, Abdul R Hamzeh, Kristy Kwong, Koula Diamand, Ainsley Davies, Fei-Ju Li, Harish Padmanabhan, Rachel Milne, Fiona Ballard, Dominik Spensberger, Elizabeth E Gardiner, Bahar Miraghazadeh, Anselm Enders, Matthew C Cook |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Israel | 2 | 13% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 6% |
| Mexico | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 12 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 94% |
| Scientists | 1 | 6% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2024.
All research outputs
#3,352,017
of 25,984,873 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
#2,762
of 11,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,866
of 225,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
#5
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,984,873 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,368 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,251 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.