↓ Skip to main content

Agricultural mechanization and the performance of the local Chinese economy

Overview of attention for article published in Food Policy, May 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Agricultural mechanization and the performance of the local Chinese economy
Published in
Food Policy, May 2024
DOI 10.1016/j.foodpol.2024.102648
Authors

Baoling Zou, Yudan Chen, Ashok K. Mishra, Stefan Hirsch

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 2 40%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 2 40%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 40%
Unknown 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2024.
All research outputs
#17,130,634
of 26,150,897 outputs
Outputs from Food Policy
#1,523
of 1,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,431
of 312,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Food Policy
#8
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,150,897 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,716 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,132 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.