You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Access, acceptance and adherence to cancer prehabilitation: a mixed-methods systematic review
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Cancer Survivorship, May 2024
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11764-024-01605-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Tessa Watts, Nicholas Courtier, Sarah Fry, Nichola Gale, Elizabeth Gillen, Grace McCutchan, Manasi Patil, Tracy Rees, Dominic Roche, Sally Wheelwright, Jane Hopkinson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 6 | 29% |
Australia | 1 | 5% |
United States | 1 | 5% |
New Zealand | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 12 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 14 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 14% |
Scientists | 3 | 14% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2024.
All research outputs
#2,827,943
of 25,895,862 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cancer Survivorship
#205
of 1,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,166
of 168,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cancer Survivorship
#3
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,895,862 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,210 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,244 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.