You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A prospective multicenter feasibility study of a miniaturized implantable continuous flow ventricular assist device in smaller children with heart failure
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Heart & Lung Transplantation, May 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.healun.2024.02.003 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christopher S. Almond, Ryan Davies, Iki Adachi, Marc Richmond, Sabrina Law, Hari Tunuguntla, Chad Mao, Fawwaz Shaw, Jodie Lantz, Peter D. Wearden, Lori C. Jordan, Rebecca N. Ichord, Kristin Burns, Victor Zak, Ashley Magnavita, Selena Gonzales, Jennifer Conway, Aamir Jeewa, D.’Andrea Freemon, Mario Stylianou, Lynn Sleeper, John C. Dykes, Michael Ma, Francis Fynn-Thompson, Angela Lorts, David Morales, Christina Vanderpluym, Kurt Dasse, M. Patricia Massicotte, Robert Jaquiss, William T. Mahle |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 115. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2024.
All research outputs
#374,075
of 25,932,719 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Heart & Lung Transplantation
#33
of 2,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,936
of 186,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Heart & Lung Transplantation
#1
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,932,719 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,811 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,231 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.