You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
High levels of mislabelling of shark flesh in Australian fish markets and seafood shops
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Marine & Freshwater Research, May 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1071/mf23198 |
| Authors |
Teagan J. Parker Kielniacz, Adam J. Stow, Nicolette C. Armansin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 47 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 6 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 11% |
| United States | 5 | 11% |
| Curaçao | 2 | 4% |
| Sri Lanka | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Bangladesh | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 23 | 49% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 35 | 74% |
| Scientists | 8 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 143. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2024.
All research outputs
#299,953
of 25,994,718 outputs
Outputs from Marine & Freshwater Research
#9
of 1,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,805
of 223,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Marine & Freshwater Research
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,994,718 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,933 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,262 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.