↓ Skip to main content

Biases in hand perception are driven by somatosensory computations, not a distorted hand model

Overview of attention for article published in Current Biology, May 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
43 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Biases in hand perception are driven by somatosensory computations, not a distorted hand model
Published in
Current Biology, May 2024
DOI 10.1016/j.cub.2024.04.010
Pubmed ID
Authors

Valeria C Peviani, Luke E Miller, W Pieter Medendorp

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,458,742
of 25,956,379 outputs
Outputs from Current Biology
#3,822
of 14,888 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,108
of 217,865 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Biology
#37
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,956,379 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,888 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 62.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 217,865 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.