↓ Skip to main content

‘The Straw that Broke the Back’, New Zealand and Britain’s Referendum on European Community Membership, 1975

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History, May 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
‘The Straw that Broke the Back’, New Zealand and Britain’s Referendum on European Community Membership, 1975
Published in
The Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History, May 2024
DOI 10.1080/03086534.2024.2344372
Authors

Hamish McDougall

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2024.
All research outputs
#6,495,246
of 25,885,333 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History
#141
of 493 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,339
of 180,995 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,885,333 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 493 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,995 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them