You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Rehabilitating coral reefs in the Anthropocene
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Current Biology, May 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.cub.2023.12.054 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alasdair Edwards, James Guest, Adriana Humanes |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 60 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 8% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 3 | 5% |
| Taiwan | 2 | 3% |
| Philippines | 2 | 3% |
| China | 1 | 2% |
| Maldives | 1 | 2% |
| Northern Mariana Islands | 1 | 2% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 26 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 42 | 70% |
| Scientists | 17 | 28% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 25% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 17% |
| Researcher | 2 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 7 | 58% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 8% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,151,814
of 25,941,588 outputs
Outputs from Current Biology
#3,303
of 14,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,385
of 213,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Biology
#31
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,941,588 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,879 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 62.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,497 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.