You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ecological grief literacy: Approaches for responding to environmental loss
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Letters, May 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1111/conl.13018 |
| Authors |
Anna Cooke, Claudia Benham, Nathalie Butt, Julie Dean |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 17 | 32% |
| Australia | 3 | 6% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 2 | 4% |
| Ireland | 2 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Faroe Islands | 1 | 2% |
| Portugal | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 24 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 45 | 85% |
| Scientists | 7 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 100% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 2 | 67% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 104. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2024.
All research outputs
#421,383
of 26,012,510 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Letters
#139
of 1,082 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,200
of 228,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Letters
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,012,510 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,082 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 53.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,739 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.