↓ Skip to main content

Upgrade of the Universal Testing Machine for the Possibilities of Fatigue Tests in a Limited Mode

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Sciences, May 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Upgrade of the Universal Testing Machine for the Possibilities of Fatigue Tests in a Limited Mode
Published in
Applied Sciences, May 2024
DOI 10.3390/app14103973
Authors

Róbert Huňady, Peter Sivák, Ingrid Delyová, Jozef Bocko, Ján Vavro, Darina Hroncová

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2024.
All research outputs
#17,645,910
of 25,864,668 outputs
Outputs from Applied Sciences
#5,229
of 15,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,561
of 146,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Sciences
#23
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,864,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,346 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 146,973 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.