You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Designing feedback processes in the workplace-based learning of undergraduate health professions education: a scoping review
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Education, April 2024
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12909-024-05439-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Javiera Fuentes-Cimma, Dominique Sluijsmans, Arnoldo Riquelme, Ignacio Villagran, Lorena Isbej, María Teresa Olivares-Labbe, Sylvia Heeneman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 2 | 12% |
Hong Kong | 2 | 12% |
Spain | 1 | 6% |
Finland | 1 | 6% |
United States | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 10 | 59% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 10 | 59% |
Scientists | 6 | 35% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2024.
All research outputs
#3,088,359
of 25,872,466 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#499
of 4,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,511
of 202,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#4
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,872,466 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,091 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,078 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.