You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Leopard traps in the Judean Desert reveal long-term impact of humans on top predator populations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Quaternary Science Reviews, June 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.quascirev.2024.108667 |
| Authors |
Uri Davidovich, Ido Wachtel, Romi Halevi, Royi Zidon, Ignacio A. Lazagabaster, Valentina Rovelli, Meirav Meiri, Roi Porat, Micka Ullman, Yael Jacobi, Amiyaal Ilany, Nimrod Marom, Naomi Porat |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 2 | 29% |
| Japan | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,971,641
of 25,886,866 outputs
Outputs from Quaternary Science Reviews
#614
of 3,921 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,459
of 76,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Quaternary Science Reviews
#10
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,886,866 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,921 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,964 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.