You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Circadian tumor infiltration and function of CD8+ T cells dictate immunotherapy efficacy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cell, May 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.cell.2024.04.015 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chen Wang, Qun Zeng, Zeynep Melis Gül, Sisi Wang, Robert Pick, Phil Cheng, Ruben Bill, Yan Wu, Stefan Naulaerts, Coline Barnoud, Pei-Chun Hsueh, Sofie Hedlund Moller, Mara Cenerenti, Mengzhu Sun, Ziyang Su, Stéphane Jemelin, Volodymyr Petrenko, Charna Dibner, Stéphanie Hugues, Camilla Jandus, Zhongwu Li, Olivier Michielin, Ping-Chih Ho, Abhishek D Garg, Federico Simonetta, Mikaël J Pittet, Christoph Scheiermann |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 311 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 55 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 17 | 5% |
| Spain | 14 | 5% |
| France | 13 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 12 | 4% |
| Mexico | 11 | 4% |
| Germany | 11 | 4% |
| Japan | 11 | 4% |
| India | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 30 | 10% |
| Unknown | 132 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 183 | 59% |
| Scientists | 93 | 30% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 32 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 65 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 23% |
| Unspecified | 10 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 12% |
| Unknown | 14 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 18% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 10 | 15% |
| Unspecified | 9 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 17 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 223. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2024.
All research outputs
#179,441
of 26,146,017 outputs
Outputs from Cell
#1,011
of 17,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,089
of 284,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell
#22
of 128 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,146,017 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,420 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 60.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,612 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 128 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.