You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, May 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41586-024-07487-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Josh Abramson, Jonas Adler, Jack Dunger, Richard Evans, Tim Green, Alexander Pritzel, Olaf Ronneberger, Lindsay Willmore, Andrew J. Ballard, Joshua Bambrick, Sebastian W. Bodenstein, David A. Evans, Chia-Chun Hung, Michael O’Neill, David Reiman, Kathryn Tunyasuvunakool, Zachary Wu, Akvilė Žemgulytė, Eirini Arvaniti, Charles Beattie, Ottavia Bertolli, Alex Bridgland, Alexey Cherepanov, Miles Congreve, Alexander I. Cowen-Rivers, Andrew Cowie, Michael Figurnov, Fabian B. Fuchs, Hannah Gladman, Rishub Jain, Yousuf A. Khan, Caroline M. R. Low, Kuba Perlin, Anna Potapenko, Pascal Savy, Sukhdeep Singh, Adrian Stecula, Ashok Thillaisundaram, Catherine Tong, Sergei Yakneen, Ellen D. Zhong, Michal Zielinski, Augustin Žídek, Victor Bapst, Pushmeet Kohli, Max Jaderberg, Demis Hassabis, John M. Jumper |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,042 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 163 | 16% |
| United Kingdom | 53 | 5% |
| Japan | 42 | 4% |
| Spain | 40 | 4% |
| Germany | 26 | 2% |
| India | 25 | 2% |
| France | 21 | 2% |
| Australia | 14 | 1% |
| Mexico | 14 | 1% |
| Other | 168 | 16% |
| Unknown | 476 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 656 | 63% |
| Scientists | 339 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 26 | 2% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 21 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 430 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 430 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 99 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 92 | 21% |
| Unspecified | 49 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 44 | 10% |
| Professor | 28 | 7% |
| Other | 97 | 23% |
| Unknown | 21 | 5% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 131 | 30% |
| Unspecified | 54 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 47 | 11% |
| Chemistry | 35 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 31 | 7% |
| Other | 93 | 22% |
| Unknown | 39 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1424. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2024.
All research outputs
#8,961
of 26,033,965 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#923
of 99,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106
of 232,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#10
of 829 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,033,965 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 99,406 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 103.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,075 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 829 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.