You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Decreased GATA3 levels cause changed mouse cutaneous innate lymphoid cell fate, facilitating hair follicle recycling
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Developmental Cell, May 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.devcel.2024.04.015 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Guanqun Ren, Yime Zhang, Jiamin Liu, Wenwen Cheng, Di Wu, Mengwei Han, Yanyu Zeng, Xingyu Zhao, Luni Hu, Min Zeng, Rama Krishna Gurram, Xiaole Hu, Bo Zhou, Zhiyuan Hou, Jinfang Zhu, Wenfei Jin, Chao Zhong |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 40% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2024.
All research outputs
#3,367,275
of 25,899,121 outputs
Outputs from Developmental Cell
#1,503
of 4,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,183
of 174,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Developmental Cell
#30
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,899,121 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,383 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,512 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.