You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
2024 AHA/ACC/AMSSM/HRS/PACES/SCMR Guideline for the Management of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Circulation, May 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1161/cir.0000000000001250 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Steve R Ommen, Carolyn Y Ho, Irfan M Asif, Seshadri Balaji, Michael A Burke, Sharlene M Day, Joseph A Dearani, Kelly C Epps, Lauren Evanovich, Victor A Ferrari, José A Joglar, Sadiya S Khan, Jeffrey J Kim, Michelle M Kittleson, Chayakrit Krittanawong, Matthew W Martinez, Seema Mital, Srihari S Naidu, Sara Saberi, Christopher Semsarian, Sabrina Times, Cynthia Burstein Waldman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 31% |
| Spain | 2 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 6% |
| Malaysia | 2 | 6% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| China | 1 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Egypt | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 11 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 51% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 23% |
| Scientists | 7 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 4 | 24% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 12% |
| Researcher | 2 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 7 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 29% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 189. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2024.
All research outputs
#219,413
of 26,067,272 outputs
Outputs from Circulation
#630
of 21,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,157
of 239,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation
#5
of 137 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,067,272 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,366 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,693 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 137 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.