↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine researchers’ practices and perceived barriers related to open science: An international, cross-sectional survey
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2024
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0301251
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 11%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 5%
Librarian 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Lecturer 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 11 58%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Linguistics 1 5%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 10 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2024.
All research outputs
#4,829,398
of 28,623,232 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#56,698
of 248,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,180
of 353,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#825
of 5,814 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,623,232 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 248,708 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,045 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,814 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.