You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Don’t be misled: Three misconceptions about external validation of clinical prediction models
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, May 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111387 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hannah M la Roi-Teeuw, Florien S van Royen, Anne de Hond, Anum Zahra, Sjoerd de Vries, Richard Bartels, Alex J Carriero, Sander van Doorn, Zoë S Dunias, Ilse Kant, Tuur Leeuwenberg, Ruben Peters, Laura Veerhoek, Maarten van Smeden, Kim Luijken |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 58 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 14% |
| United States | 5 | 9% |
| Netherlands | 4 | 7% |
| Germany | 4 | 7% |
| Belgium | 2 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| France | 2 | 3% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Singapore | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 17% |
| Unknown | 19 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 29 | 50% |
| Scientists | 26 | 45% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 25% |
| Professor | 1 | 13% |
| Researcher | 1 | 13% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 13% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 2 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 38% |
| Engineering | 2 | 25% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 1 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,187,837
of 26,114,666 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
#351
of 4,860 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,449
of 266,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
#2
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,114,666 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,860 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,948 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.