↓ Skip to main content

Validity evidence for a novel multiple-choice question bank in the field of child abuse pediatrics

Overview of attention for article published in Child Abuse & Neglect, May 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Validity evidence for a novel multiple-choice question bank in the field of child abuse pediatrics
Published in
Child Abuse & Neglect, May 2024
DOI 10.1016/j.chiabu.2024.106827
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katie L Johnson, Stephanie C Mavis, Catherine M Huber, H Michelle Greene, Caitlin E Crumm, Emily R Georges, Ajay S Koti, Emily C B Brown

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2024.
All research outputs
#17,661,642
of 25,887,951 outputs
Outputs from Child Abuse & Neglect
#3,043
of 3,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,105
of 160,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Child Abuse & Neglect
#15
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,887,951 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,711 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,829 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.