You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Place-Based Measures of Inequity and Vision Difficulty and Blindness
|
---|---|
Published in |
JAMA Ophthalmology, May 2024
|
DOI | 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2024.1207 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Patrice M. Hicks, George Lin, Paula Anne Newman-Casey, Leslie M. Niziol, Ming-Chen Lu, Maria A. Woodward, Angela R. Elam, David C. Musch, Roshanak Mehdipanah, Joshua R. Ehrlich, David B. Rein |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 5 | 63% |
Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
Scientists | 2 | 25% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2024.
All research outputs
#781,760
of 25,925,760 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Ophthalmology
#408
of 6,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,060
of 180,704 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Ophthalmology
#10
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,925,760 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,747 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,704 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.