You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
MDA5-autoimmunity and interstitial pneumonitis contemporaneous with the COVID-19 pandemic (MIP-C)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
EBioMedicine, May 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105136 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paula David, Saptarshi Sinha, Khizer Iqbal, Gabriele De Marco, Sahar Taheri, Ella McLaren, Sheetal Maisuria, Gururaj Arumugakani, Zoe Ash, Catrin Buckley, Lauren Coles, Chamila Hettiarachchi, Emma Payne, Sinisa Savic, Gayle Smithson, Maria Slade, Rahul Shah, Helena Marzo-Ortega, Mansoor Keen, Catherine Lawson, Joanna Mclorinan, Sharmin Nizam, Hanu Reddy, Omer Sharif, Shabina Sultan, Gui Tran, Mark Wood, Samuel Wood, Pradipta Ghosh, Dennis McGonagle |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 255 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 24 | 9% |
| United States | 18 | 7% |
| Netherlands | 8 | 3% |
| Germany | 4 | 2% |
| Canada | 4 | 2% |
| Spain | 4 | 2% |
| Turkey | 3 | 1% |
| France | 3 | 1% |
| India | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 19 | 7% |
| Unknown | 165 | 65% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 228 | 89% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 15 | 6% |
| Scientists | 9 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 2 | 20% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 10% |
| Other | 1 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 10% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 30% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 10% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 436. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2024.
All research outputs
#67,708
of 26,160,558 outputs
Outputs from EBioMedicine
#53
of 4,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#801
of 291,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EBioMedicine
#3
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,160,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,138 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,957 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.