You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Pegcetacoplan Treatment and Consensus Features of Geographic Atrophy Over 24 Months
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA Ophthalmology, May 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2024.1269 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dun Jack Fu, Pallavi Bagga, Gunjan Naik, Sophie Glinton, Livia Faes, Bart Liefers, Rosana Lima, Georgina Wignall, Pearse A. Keane, Estelle Ioannidou, Ana Paula Ribeiro Reis, Alex McKeown, Lukas Scheibler, Praveen J. Patel, Ismail Moghul, Nikolas Pontikos, Konstantinos Balaskas |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 45% |
| United States | 2 | 18% |
| Peru | 1 | 9% |
| Australia | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 2 | 18% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 55% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 27% |
| Scientists | 2 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 17% |
| Researcher | 1 | 17% |
| Other | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 33% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,349,978
of 25,976,786 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Ophthalmology
#697
of 6,754 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,391
of 204,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Ophthalmology
#20
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,976,786 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,754 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,120 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.