You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Patient reported outcomes and patient experiences of immune checkpoint modulators for advanced or recurrent melanoma: a mixed methods study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Supportive Care in Cancer, May 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00520-024-08538-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Danielle B. Tometich, Carley Geiss, Melinda L. Maconi, Melody Chavez, Aasha I. Hoogland, Xiaoyin Li, Amarilis Nieves-Lopez, Yvelise Rodriguez, Crystal Bryant, Andrew S. Brohl, Zeynep Eroglu, Joseph Markowitz, Ahmad A. Tarhini, Patrick Hwu, Nikhil I. Khushalani, Heather S. L. Jim |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2024.
All research outputs
#2,671,658
of 26,067,272 outputs
Outputs from Supportive Care in Cancer
#471
of 5,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,599
of 245,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Supportive Care in Cancer
#3
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,067,272 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,173 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,076 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.