| Title |
Reweighting UK Biobank corrects for pervasive selection bias due to volunteering
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Epidemiology, May 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1093/ije/dyae054 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sjoerd van Alten, Benjamin W Domingue, Jessica Faul, Titus Galama, Andries T Marees |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 45 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 20% |
| Germany | 4 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 4% |
| Austria | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Estonia | 1 | 2% |
| Norway | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 20 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 47% |
| Scientists | 19 | 42% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 1 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 25% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematics | 1 | 25% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,561,502
of 25,967,806 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Epidemiology
#767
of 5,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,892
of 201,523 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Epidemiology
#2
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,967,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,949 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,523 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.