You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Climate change, malaria and neglected tropical diseases: a scoping review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine & Hygiene, May 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1093/trstmh/trae026 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Petra Klepac, Jennifer L Hsieh, Camilla L Ducker, Mohamad Assoum, Mark Booth, Isabel Byrne, Sarity Dodson, Diana L Martin, C Michael R Turner, Kim R van Daalen, Bernadette Abela, Jennifer Akamboe, Fabiana Alves, Simon J Brooker, Karen Ciceri-Reynolds, Jeremy Cole, Aidan Desjardins, Chris Drakeley, Dileepa S Ediriweera, Neil M Ferguson, Albis Francesco Gabrielli, Joshua Gahir, Saurabh Jain, Mbaraka R John, Elizabeth Juma, Priya Kanayson, Kebede Deribe, Jonathan D King, Andrea M Kipingu, Samson Kiware, Jan Kolaczinski, Winnie J Kulei, Tajiri L Laizer, Vivek Lal, Rachel Lowe, Janice S Maige, Sam Mayer, Lachlan McIver, Jonathan F Mosser, Ruben Santiago Nicholls, Cláudio Nunes-Alves, Junaid Panjwani, Nishanth Parameswaran, Karen Polson, Hale-Seda Radoykova, Aditya Ramani, Lisa J Reimer, Zachary M Reynolds, Isabela Ribeiro, Alastair Robb, Kazim Hizbullah Sanikullah, David R M Smith, GloriaSalome G Shirima, Joseph P Shott, Rachel Tidman, Louisa Tribe, Jaspreet Turner, Susana Vaz Nery, Raman Velayudhan, Supriya Warusavithana, Holly S Wheeler, Aya Yajima, Ahmed Robleh Abdilleh, Benjamin Hounkpatin, Dechen Wangmo, Christopher J M Whitty, Diarmid Campbell-Lendrum, T Déirdre Hollingsworth, Anthony W Solomon, Ibrahima Socé Fall |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 71 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 11 | 15% |
| United States | 7 | 10% |
| India | 3 | 4% |
| Colombia | 3 | 4% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Ghana | 2 | 3% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 2 | 3% |
| Georgia | 2 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 17% |
| Unknown | 25 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 45 | 63% |
| Scientists | 14 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 33% |
| Researcher | 1 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 33% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 153. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2024.
All research outputs
#277,812
of 26,012,510 outputs
Outputs from Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine & Hygiene
#10
of 4,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,610
of 222,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine & Hygiene
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,012,510 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,042 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 222,851 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.