↓ Skip to main content

Line‐field confocal optical coherence tomography for in‐vivo characterization of allergic contact dermatitis and support of the clinical grading: A prospective pilot study

Overview of attention for article published in Contact Dermatitis (01051873), May 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Line‐field confocal optical coherence tomography for in‐vivo characterization of allergic contact dermatitis and support of the clinical grading: A prospective pilot study
Published in
Contact Dermatitis (01051873), May 2024
DOI 10.1111/cod.14578
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maximilian Deußing, Cristel Ruini, Fabia Daxenberger, Lars E. French, Daniela Hartmann, Eva Oppel, Elke C. Sattler

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2024.
All research outputs
#17,677,822
of 25,914,360 outputs
Outputs from Contact Dermatitis (01051873)
#1,950
of 2,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,341
of 175,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Contact Dermatitis (01051873)
#4
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,914,360 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,634 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,472 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.