You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cenozoic Dalbergia (Fabaceae) plant fossils from Southwest China: Biogeographic implications and plant-insect interactions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, August 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.palaeo.2024.112260 |
| Authors |
Yishan Zhao, Torsten Wappler, Conrad Labandeira, Jian Huang, Ai Song, Sanping Xie, Linbo Jia, Weiyudong Deng, Tao Su |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 19% |
| United States | 3 | 19% |
| Japan | 2 | 13% |
| Portugal | 1 | 6% |
| India | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 69% |
| Scientists | 5 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2024.
All research outputs
#3,490,126
of 26,018,952 outputs
Outputs from Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology
#572
of 4,374 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#477
of 5,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology
#1
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,018,952 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,374 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 5,568 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.