↓ Skip to main content

An improvement of the Revised Wind Erosion Equation by considering the effect of non-photosynthetic vegetation

Overview of attention for article published in Geoderma, May 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An improvement of the Revised Wind Erosion Equation by considering the effect of non-photosynthetic vegetation
Published in
Geoderma, May 2024
DOI 10.1016/j.geoderma.2024.116880
Authors

Xiufan Liu, Heqiang Du, Xinlei Liu, Yawei Fan, Sen Li, Tao Wang, Zichen Guo

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2024.
All research outputs
#2,556,258
of 25,895,862 outputs
Outputs from Geoderma
#160
of 2,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,548
of 186,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geoderma
#4
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,895,862 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,974 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,766 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.