↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Generalizability of the Spectrum of Kidney Risk in the FINEARTS-HF Trial to US Adults with Heart Failure

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cardiac Failure, May 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
57 X users
Title
Generalizability of the Spectrum of Kidney Risk in the FINEARTS-HF Trial to US Adults with Heart Failure
Published in
Journal of Cardiac Failure, May 2024
DOI 10.1016/j.cardfail.2024.04.015
Pubmed ID
Authors

John W Ostrominski, Rahul Aggarwal, Brian L Claggett, Ian J Kulac, Akshay S Desai, Pardeep S Jhund, Carolyn S P Lam, Bertram Pitt, Michele Senni, Sanjiv J Shah, Adriaan A Voors, Faiez Zannad, James Lay-Flurrie, Prabhakar Viswanathan, John J V McMurray, Scott D Solomon, Muthiah Vaduganathan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 57 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,274,562
of 25,954,278 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cardiac Failure
#152
of 2,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,669
of 184,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cardiac Failure
#1
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,954,278 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,079 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,174 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.