↓ Skip to main content

Horticultural additives influence peat biogeochemistry and increase short-term CO2 production from peat

Overview of attention for article published in Plant and Soil, May 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Horticultural additives influence peat biogeochemistry and increase short-term CO2 production from peat
Published in
Plant and Soil, May 2024
DOI 10.1007/s11104-024-06685-9
Authors

Bidhya Sharma, Tim R. Moore, Klaus-Holger Knorr, Henning Teickner, Peter M. J. Douglas, Nigel T. Roulet

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2024.
All research outputs
#6,425,672
of 25,971,360 outputs
Outputs from Plant and Soil
#642
of 3,455 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,186
of 200,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant and Soil
#8
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,971,360 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,455 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,416 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.