You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Dataset for reporting of the invasive carcinoma of the breast: recommendations from the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR)
|
---|---|
Published in |
Histopathology, May 2024
|
DOI | 10.1111/his.15191 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ian Ellis, Fleur Webster, Kimberly H Allison, Chau Dang, Helenice Gobbi, Janina Kulka, Sunil R Lakhani, Takuya Moriya, Cecily M Quinn, Anna Sapino, Stuart Schnitt, D Mark Sibbering, Elzbieta Slodkowska, Wentao Yang, Puay H Tan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 2 | 14% |
Brazil | 2 | 14% |
Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | 7% |
India | 1 | 7% |
Italy | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 7 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 13 | 93% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2024.
All research outputs
#4,414,562
of 25,913,612 outputs
Outputs from Histopathology
#486
of 3,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,655
of 172,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Histopathology
#6
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,913,612 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,552 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,542 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.