You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Diverging phenology of American lobster (Homarus americanus) larvae and their zooplankton prey in a warming ocean
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
ICES Journal of Marine Science / Journal du Conseil, May 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1093/icesjms/fsae051 |
| Authors |
Joshua T Carloni, Richard A Wahle, David M Fields, Paul Geoghegan, Burton Shank |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Norway | 1 | 25% |
| Denmark | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2024.
All research outputs
#2,668,291
of 25,898,387 outputs
Outputs from ICES Journal of Marine Science / Journal du Conseil
#544
of 3,395 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,524
of 187,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ICES Journal of Marine Science / Journal du Conseil
#2
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,898,387 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,395 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,201 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.