↓ Skip to main content

Antibacterial activity of high surface area zinc oxide nanoparticles for controlling black rot disease of Chinese kale

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Pathology, May 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Antibacterial activity of high surface area zinc oxide nanoparticles for controlling black rot disease of Chinese kale
Published in
Plant Pathology, May 2024
DOI 10.1111/ppa.13923
Authors

Supisara Sripo‐ngam, Choosak Khaengraeng, Supot Kasem, Tiyakhon Chatnaparat

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2024.
All research outputs
#14,812,101
of 25,914,360 outputs
Outputs from Plant Pathology
#1,197
of 2,227 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,533
of 159,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Pathology
#10
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,914,360 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,227 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 159,444 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.