↓ Skip to main content

“Peter Howitt’s Keynesian Recovery and Keynes: an assessment”

Overview of attention for article published in The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, May 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
“Peter Howitt’s Keynesian Recovery and Keynes: an assessment”
Published in
The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, May 2024
DOI 10.1080/09672567.2024.2329057
Authors

Sylvie Rivot

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2024.
All research outputs
#7,504,116
of 25,942,066 outputs
Outputs from The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought
#146
of 492 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,594
of 188,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,942,066 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 492 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,569 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.