| Title |
Mortality of Patients With Sepsis Administered Piperacillin-Tazobactam vs Cefepime
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA Internal Medicine, May 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.0581 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rishi Chanderraj, Andrew J. Admon, Ying He, Mark Nuppnau, Owen R. Albin, Hallie C. Prescott, Robert P. Dickson, Michael W. Sjoding |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 553 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 128 | 23% |
| United Kingdom | 31 | 6% |
| Japan | 24 | 4% |
| Canada | 14 | 3% |
| Spain | 13 | 2% |
| Australia | 12 | 2% |
| India | 11 | 2% |
| Mexico | 11 | 2% |
| Colombia | 10 | 2% |
| Other | 68 | 12% |
| Unknown | 231 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 366 | 66% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 94 | 17% |
| Scientists | 90 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 1 | 33% |
| Other | 1 | 33% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 67% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 435. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2024.
All research outputs
#67,402
of 26,038,372 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Internal Medicine
#521
of 11,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#570
of 214,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Internal Medicine
#10
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,038,372 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,773 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 85.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,543 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.