You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Nf1 deficiency modulates the stromal environment in the pretumorigenic rat mammary gland
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, May 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcell.2024.1375441 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Menusha Arumugam, Elizabeth A. Tovar, Curt J. Essenburg, Patrick S. Dischinger, Ian Beddows, Emily Wolfrum, Zach B. Madaj, Lisa Turner, Kristin Feenstra, Kristin L. Gallik, Lorna Cohen, Madison Nichols, Rachel T. C. Sheridan, Corinne R. Esquibel, Ghassan Mouneimne, Carrie R. Graveel, Matthew R. Steensma |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 71% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 4 | 57% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2024.
All research outputs
#7,239,312
of 25,927,633 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
#1,684
of 10,595 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,251
of 176,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
#3
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,927,633 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,595 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,759 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.