You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Comparing stimulus preference and response force in a conjugate preparation: A replication with auditory stimulation
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, May 2024
|
DOI | 10.1002/jeab.915 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jennifer L. Cook, Rasha R. Baruni, Jonathan W. Pinkston, John T. Rapp, Raymond G. Miltenberger, Shreeya Deshmukh, Emma Walker, Sharayah Tai |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2024.
All research outputs
#4,483,561
of 26,146,017 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
#133
of 1,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,685
of 283,490 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,146,017 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,052 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,490 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them