↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Randomised, controlled, feasibility trial comparing vasopressor infusion administered via peripheral cannula versus central venous catheter for critically ill adults: A study protocol
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2024
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0295347
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 3 11%
Unspecified 3 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Researcher 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 16 59%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 15%
Unspecified 3 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Sports and Recreations 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 16 59%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2024.
All research outputs
#19,526,738
of 29,968,594 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#123,636
of 207,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,935
of 345,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,000
of 2,043 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,968,594 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 207,453 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.1. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,747 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,043 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.