↓ Skip to main content

Bleaching and recovery in the giant clam Tridacna crocea from the sub-tropical waters of Okinawa

Overview of attention for article published in Coral Reefs, May 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
18 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bleaching and recovery in the giant clam Tridacna crocea from the sub-tropical waters of Okinawa
Published in
Coral Reefs, May 2024
DOI 10.1007/s00338-024-02502-y
Authors

Sherry Lyn G. Sayco, Haruko Kurihara

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2024.
All research outputs
#3,158,702
of 25,965,655 outputs
Outputs from Coral Reefs
#399
of 1,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,389
of 179,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Coral Reefs
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,965,655 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,956 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,241 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.