You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Generation of allogeneic CAR-NKT cells from hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells using a clinically guided culture method
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature Biotechnology, May 2024
|
DOI | 10.1038/s41587-024-02226-y |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yan-Ruide Li, Yang Zhou, Jiaji Yu, Yu Jeong Kim, Miao Li, Derek Lee, Kuangyi Zhou, Yuning Chen, Yichen Zhu, Yu-Chen Wang, Zhe Li, Yanqi Yu, Zachary Spencer Dunn, Wenbin Guo, Xinjian Cen, Tiffany Husman, Aarushi Bajpai, Adam Kramer, Matthew Wilson, Ying Fang, Jie Huang, Shuo Li, Yonggang Zhou, Yuchong Zhang, Zoe Hahn, Enbo Zhu, Feiyang Ma, Calvin Pan, Aldons J. Lusis, Jin J. Zhou, Christopher S. Seet, Donald B. Kohn, Pin Wang, Xianghong Jasmine Zhou, Matteo Pellegrini, Benjamin R. Puliafito, Sarah M. Larson, Lili Yang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 85 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 24 | 28% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 4% |
India | 3 | 4% |
Singapore | 2 | 2% |
Mexico | 2 | 2% |
Spain | 2 | 2% |
Italy | 1 | 1% |
Chile | 1 | 1% |
Brazil | 1 | 1% |
Other | 9 | 11% |
Unknown | 37 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 59 | 69% |
Scientists | 21 | 25% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 4% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 29% |
Researcher | 3 | 21% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 7% |
Professor | 1 | 7% |
Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 4 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 29% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 14% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 7% |
Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 7% |
Other | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 4 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 65. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2024.
All research outputs
#686,226
of 26,154,612 outputs
Outputs from Nature Biotechnology
#1,397
of 8,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,020
of 265,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Biotechnology
#15
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,154,612 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,678 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,662 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.