You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
OpenFold: retraining AlphaFold2 yields new insights into its learning mechanisms and capacity for generalization
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Methods, May 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41592-024-02272-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gustaf Ahdritz, Nazim Bouatta, Christina Floristean, Sachin Kadyan, Qinghui Xia, William Gerecke, Timothy J. O’Donnell, Daniel Berenberg, Ian Fisk, Niccolò Zanichelli, Bo Zhang, Arkadiusz Nowaczynski, Bei Wang, Marta M. Stepniewska-Dziubinska, Shang Zhang, Adegoke Ojewole, Murat Efe Guney, Stella Biderman, Andrew M. Watkins, Stephen Ra, Pablo Ribalta Lorenzo, Lucas Nivon, Brian Weitzner, Yih-En Andrew Ban, Shiyang Chen, Minjia Zhang, Conglong Li, Shuaiwen Leon Song, Yuxiong He, Peter K. Sorger, Emad Mostaque, Zhao Zhang, Richard Bonneau, Mohammed AlQuraishi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 400 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 68 | 17% |
| Japan | 17 | 4% |
| India | 16 | 4% |
| Germany | 12 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 11 | 3% |
| Spain | 9 | 2% |
| France | 7 | 2% |
| Australia | 6 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 51 | 13% |
| Unknown | 198 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 258 | 65% |
| Scientists | 138 | 35% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | <1% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 132 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 28 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 9% |
| Unknown | 46 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 31 | 23% |
| Chemistry | 11 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 8 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 11% |
| Unknown | 57 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 244. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2024.
All research outputs
#158,274
of 26,020,829 outputs
Outputs from Nature Methods
#101
of 5,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,290
of 208,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Methods
#2
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,020,829 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,447 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,522 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.