You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Correction: From gene banks to farmer’s fields: using genomic selection to identify donors for a breeding program in rice to close the yield gap on smallholder farms
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Theoretical and Applied Genetics, May 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00122-024-04622-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ryokei Tanaka, James Lui-King, Sarah Tojo Mandaharisoa, Mbolatantely Rakotondramanana, Harisoa Nicole Ranaivo, Juan Pariasca-Tanaka, Hiromi Kajiya Kanegae, Hiroyoshi Iwata, Matthias Wissuwa |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2024.
All research outputs
#17,669,971
of 25,901,238 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical and Applied Genetics
#3,198
of 3,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,164
of 160,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical and Applied Genetics
#26
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,901,238 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,867 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,763 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.