↓ Skip to main content

Changing US Support for Public Health Data Use Through Pandemic and Political Turmoil

Overview of attention for article published in Milbank Quarterly, May 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Changing US Support for Public Health Data Use Through Pandemic and Political Turmoil
Published in
Milbank Quarterly, May 2024
DOI 10.1111/1468-0009.12700
Pubmed ID
Authors

CASON D. SCHMIT, BRIAN N. LARSON, THOMAS TANABE, MAHIN RAMEZANI, QI ZHENG, HYE‐CHUNG KUM

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2024.
All research outputs
#4,361,805
of 25,922,020 outputs
Outputs from Milbank Quarterly
#571
of 1,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,209
of 159,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Milbank Quarterly
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,922,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,180 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 159,801 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them