↓ Skip to main content

The Role of Field Cancerization in Selecting Therapies for Actinic Keratosis: An Expert Consensus Panel

Overview of attention for article published in SKIN The Journal of Cutaneous Medicine, May 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#9 of 159)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
25 news outlets

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The Role of Field Cancerization in Selecting Therapies for Actinic Keratosis: An Expert Consensus Panel
Published in
SKIN The Journal of Cutaneous Medicine, May 2024
DOI 10.25251/skin.8.3.1
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 190. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2024.
All research outputs
#260,975
of 34,306,620 outputs
Outputs from SKIN The Journal of Cutaneous Medicine
#9
of 159 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,851
of 368,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SKIN The Journal of Cutaneous Medicine
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,306,620 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 159 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,893 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them