You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ultrastructural differences impact cilia shape and external exposure across cell classes in the visual cortex
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Current Biology, May 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.cub.2024.04.043 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carolyn M Ott, Russel Torres, Tung-Sheng Kuan, Aaron Kuan, JoAnn Buchanan, Leila Elabbady, Sharmishtaa Seshamani, Agnes L Bodor, Forrest Collman, Davi D Bock, Wei Chung Lee, Nuno Maçarico da Costa, Jennifer Lippincott-Schwartz |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 98 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 23 | 23% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 5% |
| France | 4 | 4% |
| Spain | 4 | 4% |
| Canada | 3 | 3% |
| Germany | 3 | 3% |
| India | 2 | 2% |
| Portugal | 2 | 2% |
| Mexico | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Unknown | 40 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 56 | 57% |
| Scientists | 39 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 2% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 1 | 100% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 53. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2024.
All research outputs
#822,572
of 26,005,389 outputs
Outputs from Current Biology
#2,652
of 14,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,215
of 203,540 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Biology
#30
of 129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,005,389 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,913 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 62.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 203,540 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.