You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Characterisation and simulation of stitched CMOS strip sensors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research Section A, July 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.nima.2024.169407 |
| Authors |
Naomi Davis, Jan-Hendrik Arling, Marta Baselga, Leena Diehl, Jochen Dingfelder, Ingrid-Maria Gregor, Marc Hauser, Fabian Hügging, Tomasz Hemperek, Karl Jakobs, Michael Karagounis, Roland Koppenhöfer, Kevin Kröninger, Fabian Lex, Ulrich Parzefall, Arturo Rodriguez, Birkan Sari, Niels Sorgenfrei, Simon Spannagel, Dennis Sperlich, Tianyang Wang, Jens Weingarten, Iveta Zatocilova |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2024.
All research outputs
#6,836,524
of 26,106,397 outputs
Outputs from Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research Section A
#1,081
of 8,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,759
of 73,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research Section A
#1
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,106,397 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,975 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 73,573 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.