↓ Skip to main content

Social Factors Associated with Congenital Syphilis in Missouri

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Infectious Diseases, May 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
42 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Social Factors Associated with Congenital Syphilis in Missouri
Published in
Clinical Infectious Diseases, May 2024
DOI 10.1093/cid/ciae260
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth Daniels, Andrew Atkinson, Nicholas Cardoza, Aditi Ramakrishnan, Denise Willers, Hilary Reno

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,573,987
of 26,011,622 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#2,774
of 17,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,592
of 212,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#26
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,011,622 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,043 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,578 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.