You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluating the techno-economic feasibility of hydrogen-fuelled reciprocating engines for renewable base-load power generation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Energy Conversion & Management, July 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.enconman.2024.118515 |
| Authors |
Jiayi Li, Cheng Wang, Guanxiong Zhai, Qiyuan Li, Shen H. Lim, Shiva Abdoli, Sanghoon Kook, Guan H. Yeoh, Qing N. Chan |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2024.
All research outputs
#5,002,273
of 26,032,395 outputs
Outputs from Energy Conversion & Management
#225
of 2,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,966
of 46,526 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Energy Conversion & Management
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,032,395 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,271 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 46,526 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.