You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Association between anaesthesia–surgery team sex diversity and major morbidity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of Surgery, May 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1093/bjs/znae097 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Julie Hallet, Rinku Sutradhar, Alana Flexman, Daniel I McIsaac, François M Carrier, Alexis F Turgeon, Colin McCartney, Wing C Chan, Natalie Coburn, Antoine Eskander, Angela Jerath, Pablo Perez d'Empaire, Gianni Lorello |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 94 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 14 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 13 | 14% |
| United States | 7 | 7% |
| Spain | 4 | 4% |
| Australia | 3 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 2% |
| Japan | 2 | 2% |
| Chile | 2 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 36 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 41 | 44% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 29 | 31% |
| Scientists | 19 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 2 | 67% |
| Other | 1 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 67% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 439. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2024.
All research outputs
#66,369
of 26,002,074 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Surgery
#9
of 6,097 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#519
of 197,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Surgery
#1
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,002,074 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,097 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,741 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.