↓ Skip to main content

Origin of deactivation of aqueous Na–CO2 battery and mitigation for long-duration energy storage

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Power Sources, July 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#19 of 9,861)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
16 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Origin of deactivation of aqueous Na–CO2 battery and mitigation for long-duration energy storage
Published in
Journal of Power Sources, July 2024
DOI 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2024.234643
Authors

Ruhul Amin, Marm Dixit, Mengya Li, Rachid Essehli, Sabine Neumayer, Yaocai Bai, Anuj Bisht, Yang Guang, Ilias Belharouak

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 115. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2024.
All research outputs
#376,963
of 25,992,468 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Power Sources
#19
of 9,861 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#386
of 33,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Power Sources
#1
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,992,468 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,861 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 33,584 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.